Michael Venus vs Tommy PaulPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Michael Venus and Tommy Paul have met 1 time since 2017; Tommy Paul leads 1–0. Across all meetings Venus has taken 0 sets to Paul's 2. Their most recent meeting: Tommy Paul won at Irving (2017).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Venus | Paul | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Michael Venus | Tommy Paul | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 57% | 17/30 | |
| Wins a set when losing | — | 57% | 8/14 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | — | 48% | 21/44 | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 38% | 15/39 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 100% | 4/4 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 62% | 13/21 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 79% | 22/28 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 61% | 17/28 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Venus 0, Paul 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Venus
🎯 Baseliner
Paul
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,249 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Mar 1, 2017
Irving
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Venus | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.81 |
| ROI % | - | +1.3% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.17u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Venus | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 1,092 mi · 1,758 km |
| Route | — | JPN → CHN |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Jeremy Chardy
ATP Masters 1000 Rome · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1
Tennys Sandgren
ASB Classic - Auckland · 1st Round
Jan 13
Roberto Bautista Agut
Auckland · Round of 32
Jan 10
Zihao Xia
Chengdu · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 25
Tommy Paul
Irving · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 1
Feliciano Lopez
Auckland · Round of 32
Jan 11
Joseph Huber
Aix en Provence · 1st Round Qualifying
May 2
Gerard Granollers
Aix en Provence · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 2
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 2nd Round
Oct 10
Alejandro Tabilo
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo · 1st Round
Sep 30
Carlos Alcaraz
U.S. Open - New York · 4th Round
Sep 6
Alexander Bublik
U.S. Open - New York · 3rd Round
Sep 4
Dino Prizmic
U.S. Open - New York · 2nd Round
Sep 3
Chak Pong Marco Lam
U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round
Aug 30
Flavio Cobolli
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati · Quarterfinals
Aug 20
Alexander Zverev
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati · 4th Round
Aug 19
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 58–58 matches
| Metric | Venus | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 69% |
| Sets won | - | 64% |
| Games won | - | 54% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Venus | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Venus | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.