Brandon Nakashima vs Liam BroadyPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

πΊπΈBrandon Nakashima
#19 Β· 25 yrs Β· R
33 meetings Β· sets 5β2

π¬π§Liam Broady
#213 Β· 32 yrs Β· L
8Brandon Nakashima and Liam Broady have met 3 times since 2020; Brandon Nakashima leads 2β1. Their first meeting came at Indian Wells Challenger in 2020 on hard. On hard courts Nakashima leads 2β0. Across all meetings Nakashima has taken 5 sets to Broady's 2. Their most recent meeting: Brandon Nakashima won at Bergamo Challenger (2023).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Nakashima | Broady | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Brandon Nakashima | Liam Broady | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 74% | 23/31 | 72% | 31/43 |
| Wins a set when losing | 40% | 8/20 | 32% | 9/28 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 31% | 16/51 | 30% | 21/71 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 55% | 18/33 | 47% | 26/55 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 75% | 12/16 | 50% | 6/12 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 50% | 14/28 | 46% | 11/24 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 85% | 28/33 | 91% | 40/44 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 70% | 23/33 | 70% | 31/44 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Nakashima 2, Broady 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nakashima
π€ Servebot
Broady
πͺ Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The π€ Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs πͺ Counterpuncher across 3,438 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Brandon Nakashima.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
3 career meetings, newest first
Nov 2, 2023
Bergamo Challenger
H Hard Β· 2nd Round
Apr 15, 2021
Belgrade Challenger
C Clay Β· Quarterfinals
Mar 3, 2020
Indian Wells Challenger
H Hard Β· 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Nakashima | Broady | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Brandon Nakashima | Liam Broady | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 21/21 | 100% | 6/6 |
| 3 or more | 95% | 20/21 | 33% | 2/6 |
| 5 or more | 91% | 19/21 | 33% | 2/6 |
| 10 or more | 52% | 11/21 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 15 or more | 10% | 2/21 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 20 or more | 5% | 1/21 | 0% | 0/6 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 15β6 | 0β6 |
| Avg odds | 1.84 | 1.79 |
| ROI % | +27.8% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +5.84u | -6.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 3 | 1 |
| Events | 3 | 1 |
| Matches | 4 | 1 |
| Distance | 7,032 mi Β· 11,317 km | 0 mi Β· 0 km |
| Route | GBR β JPN β CHN | FRA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Across 2 shared opponents, both Nakashima and Broady posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Michelsen | L 36 46 46 | L 36 67 |
| Jan-Lennard Struff | L 64 67 67 76 67 | L 46 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alexander Bublik
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai Β· 3rd Round
Oct 11
Matteo Berrettini
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai Β· 2nd Round
Oct 9
Ugo Humbert
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo Β· 1st Round
Oct 1
Jakub Mensik
Laver Cup - London Β· Round Robin
Sep 25
Alex Michelsen
U.S. Open - New York Β· 2nd Round
Sep 2
Sebastian Baez
U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round
Aug 31
Frances Tiafoe
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· Semifinals
Aug 23
Taylor Fritz
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· Quarterfinals
Aug 21
Dominic Stricker
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 30
Marco Cecchinato
U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 24
Dhakshineswar Suresh
Brownsburg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Aug 12
Ozan Baris
Lexington Challenger Β· 1st Round
Aug 4
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Yuta Shimizu
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 21
Aleksandar Vukic
Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 13
Alex Michelsen
Newport Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 59β71 matches
| Metric | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 59% | 61% |
| Sets won | 58% | 58% |
| Games won | 53% | 55% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 2 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 2 | 0 |
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.