Brandon Nakashima vs Liam BroadyPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

πΊπΈBrandon Nakashima
#17 Β· 25 yrs Β· R
33 meetings Β· sets 5β2

π¬π§Liam Broady
#197 Β· 32 yrs Β· L
6Brandon Nakashima and Liam Broady have met 3 times since 2020; Brandon Nakashima leads 2β1. Their first meeting came at Indian Wells Challenger in 2020 on hard. On hard courts Nakashima leads 2β0. Across all meetings Nakashima has taken 5 sets to Broady's 2. Their most recent meeting: Brandon Nakashima won at Bergamo Challenger (2023).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Nakashima | Broady | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Brandon Nakashima | Liam Broady | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 74% | 25/34 | 78% | 50/64 |
| Wins a set when losing | 33% | 7/21 | 29% | 8/28 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 29% | 16/55 | 24% | 22/92 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 54% | 20/37 | 56% | 41/73 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 69% | 11/16 | 42% | 5/12 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 50% | 15/30 | 50% | 12/24 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 88% | 30/34 | 94% | 60/64 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 74% | 25/34 | 78% | 50/64 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Nakashima 2, Broady 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nakashima
π€ Servebot
Broady
πͺ Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The π€ Servebot archetype wins about 57% vs πͺ Counterpuncher across 2,280 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Brandon Nakashima.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
3 career meetings, newest first
Nov 2, 2023
Bergamo Challenger
H Hard Β· 2nd Round
Apr 15, 2021
Belgrade Challenger
C Clay Β· Quarterfinals
Mar 3, 2020
Indian Wells Challenger
H Hard Β· 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Nakashima | Broady | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Brandon Nakashima | Liam Broady | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 21/21 | 100% | 15/15 |
| 3 or more | 100% | 21/21 | 67% | 10/15 |
| 5 or more | 91% | 19/21 | 33% | 5/15 |
| 10 or more | 43% | 9/21 | 0% | 0/15 |
| 15 or more | 14% | 3/21 | 0% | 0/15 |
| 20 or more | 10% | 2/21 | 0% | 0/15 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 16β5 | 5β11 |
| Avg odds | 1.87 | 2.09 |
| ROI % | +38.6% | -50.7% |
| Units P/L | +8.10u | -8.11u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | 1 |
| Events | 3 | 2 |
| Matches | 13 | 2 |
| Distance | 1,200 mi Β· 1,932 km | 161 mi Β· 259 km |
| Route | USA β CAN β USA | USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Nakashima and Broady posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | L 64 67 67 76 67 | L 46 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Frances Tiafoe
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· Semifinals
Aug 23
Taylor Fritz
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· Quarterfinals
Aug 21
Nuno Borges
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 4th Round
Aug 20
Daniil Medvedev
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 3rd Round
Aug 18
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 2nd Round
Aug 16
Ben Shelton
National Bank Open - Montreal Β· Final
Aug 14
Rafael Jodar
National Bank Open - Montreal Β· Semifinals
Aug 13
Luciano Darderi
National Bank Open - Montreal Β· Quarterfinals
Aug 11
Dhakshineswar Suresh
Brownsburg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Aug 12
Ozan Baris
Lexington Challenger Β· 1st Round
Aug 4
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Yuta Shimizu
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 21
Aleksandar Vukic
Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 14
Alex Michelsen
Newport Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Andre Ilagan
Newport Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 9
Aleksandar Vukic
Newport Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 61β92 matches
| Metric | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 61% | 70% |
| Sets won | 59% | 66% |
| Games won | 53% | 59% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 2 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Nakashima | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 2 | 0 |
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.