Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Jason Jung vs Yoshihito NishiokaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Jason Jung and Yoshihito Nishioka have met 4 times since 2015; Yoshihito Nishioka leads 3–1. Their first meeting came at Yokohama in 2015 on hard. On hard courts Nishioka leads 3–0. Nishioka has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Jung has taken 3 sets to Nishioka's 6. Their most recent meeting: Yoshihito Nishioka won at Kobe Challenger (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorJungNishioka
Wins in straight sets60%75%
Wins a set when losing38%71%
Goes to a deciding set38%39%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite65%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog58%60%
Tiebreak sets won86%67%
Wins after taking set 167%88%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 150%75%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 3 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Jung 1, Nishioka 2).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Jung

🛡️ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents
vs

Nishioka

🎯 Baseliner

Precise groundstrokesCourt controlPatient constructionConsistent depth

Matchup analysis

The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 94 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Yoshihito Nishioka.

Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

4 career meetings, newest first

Nov 11, 2025

Kobe Challenger

H Hard · 1st Round

61
36
46
Nishioka

Nov 6, 2025

Taipei Challenger

H Hard · 2nd Round

57
26
Nishioka

Sep 10, 2016

Kaohsiung

? Carpet · Round of 32

64
63
Jung

Nov 12, 2015

Yokohama

H Hard · Round of 16

26
57
Nishioka

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricJungNishioka
W-L2–2-
Avg odds5.26-
ROI %+27.8%-
Units P/L+1.11u-

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Jung and Nishioka posted a 100% win rate.

OpponentJungNishioka
James McCabe
W
64
63
W
62
57
61

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Jung
LWWWLLLL
L

Alex Michelsen

Newport Challenger · 2nd Round

16
36

Jul 9

W

James McCabe

Newport Challenger · 1st Round

64
63

Jul 8

W

Hiroki Moriya

Newport challenger

766
763

Jul 7

W

Alvaro Lopez San Martin

Newport challenger

763
36
64

Jul 5

L

Zdenek Kolar

Bratislava Challenger · 1st Round

36
16

Jun 9

L

Andre Ilagan

Wuxi Challenger · 1st Round

46
46

May 5

L

Giles Hussey

Jiujiang Challenger · 1st Round

26
63
36

Apr 29

L

Hyeon Chung

Gwangju Challenger · 1st Round

36
46

Apr 21

Nishioka
LLLWWWWW
L

Coleman Wong

Delray Beach Open · 1st Round Qualifying

26
26

Feb 14

L

Jurij Rodionov

Davis Cup, World Group, Q, JPN-AUT 2-3 · Rubber 5

75
16
06

Feb 7

L

Kyrian Jacquet

Canberra Challenger · 1st Round

62
16
57

Jan 5

W

Jason Jung

Kobe Challenger · 1st Round

16
63
64

Nov 11

W

James Duckworth

Taipei Challenger · Final

75
765

Nov 9

W

James McCabe

Taipei Challenger · Semifinals

62
57
61

Nov 8

W

Akira Santillan

Taipei Challenger · Quarterfinals

62
57
64

Nov 7

W

Jason Jung

Taipei Challenger · 2nd Round

75
62

Nov 6

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

JungNishioka aheadNishioka

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 13–23 matches

MetricJungNishioka
Matches won38%70%
Sets won42%67%
Games won46%54%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageJungNishioka
ATP Challenger Tour13

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceJungNishioka
Hard03
Carpet10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Jason Jung vs Yoshihito Nishioka FAQ

Yoshihito Nishioka leads the head-to-head 3–1 over 4 meetings.