James McCabe vs Yoshihito NishiokaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

๐ฆ๐บJames McCabe
#242 ยท 23 yrs ยท R
41 meeting ยท sets 1โ2

๐ฏ๐ตYoshihito Nishioka
#202 ยท 30 yrs ยท L
28wJames McCabe and Yoshihito Nishioka have met 1 time since 2025; Yoshihito Nishioka leads 1โ0. Across all meetings McCabe has taken 1 sets to Nishioka's 2. Their most recent meeting: Yoshihito Nishioka won at Taipei Challenger (2025).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months
| Indicator | McCabe | Nishioka | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | James McCabe | Yoshihito Nishioka | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 69% | 24/35 | 75% | 12/16 |
| Wins a set when losing | 33% | 10/30 | 71% | 5/7 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 32% | 21/65 | 39% | 9/23 |
| Covers โ1.5 sets as favorite | 46% | 19/41 | 65% | 11/17 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 58% | 14/24 | 60% | 3/5 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 47% | 16/34 | 67% | 4/6 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 82% | 27/33 | 88% | 14/16 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 73% | 24/33 | 75% | 12/16 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (McCabe 0, Nishioka 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
McCabe
๐ค Servebot
Nishioka
๐ฏ Baseliner
Matchup analysis
๐ค Servebot vs ๐ฏ Baseliner is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,749 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Nov 8, 2025
Taipei Challenger
H Hard ยท Semifinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days
| Metric | McCabe | Nishioka |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4โ9 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.90 | - |
| ROI % | -48.1% | - |
| Units P/L | -6.25u | - |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | McCabe | Nishioka |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | โ |
| Events | 2 | โ |
| Matches | 2 | โ |
| Distance | โ | โ |
| Route | USA | โ |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months
Nishioka has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs McCabe's 50%).
| Opponent | McCabe | Nishioka |
|---|---|---|
| Jason Jung | L 46 36 | W 16 63 64 |
| Shinji Hazawa | W 64 64 | W 64 63 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Noah Zamora
M25 East Lansing ยท 1st Round
Aug 12
Dusan Lajovic
Lexington Challenger ยท 1st Round
Aug 4
Duncan Chan
Winnipeg Challenger ยท 1st Round
Jul 22
Bernard Tomic
Lincoln Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Jul 16
Masamichi Imamura
Lincoln Challenger ยท 1st Round
Jul 15
Jason Jung
Newport Challenger ยท 1st Round
Jul 8
Roman Safiullin
Wimbledon ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 29
Remy Bertola
Lexus Nottingham Open ยท 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 14
Coleman Wong
Delray Beach Open ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 14
Jurij Rodionov
Davis Cup, World Group, Q, JPN-AUT 2-3 ยท Rubber 5
Feb 7
Kyrian Jacquet
Canberra Challenger ยท 1st Round
Jan 5
Jason Jung
Kobe Challenger ยท 1st Round
Nov 11
James Duckworth
Taipei Challenger ยท Final
Nov 9
James McCabe
Taipei Challenger ยท Semifinals
Nov 8
Akira Santillan
Taipei Challenger ยท Quarterfinals
Nov 7
Jason Jung
Taipei Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Nov 6
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 23โ65 matches
| Metric | McCabe | Nishioka |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 54% | 70% |
| Sets won | 53% | 67% |
| Games won | 51% | 54% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | McCabe | Nishioka |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | McCabe | Nishioka |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.