WTA 250 Β· Round of 16 Β· Seoul
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
βοΈ Grinder
Krumm
π Pusher
Matchup analysis
The βοΈ Grinder archetype wins about 63% vs π Pusher across 1,281 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Sloane Stephens here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Krumm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1β4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 1 career meeting
1
Stephens
0
Krumm
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Krumm |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Kimiko Date Krumm face off in the Round of 16 at Seoul on Hard.
Sloane Stephens leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Kimiko Date Krumm is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aleksandra Krunic (Sep 11).
Share this match