Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Kimiko Date Krumm vs Sloane StephensPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Kimiko Date Krumm and Sloane Stephens have met 1 time since 2015; Sloane Stephens leads 1–0. Across all meetings Krumm has taken 0 sets to Stephens's 2. Their most recent meeting: Sloane Stephens won at Seoul (2015).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorDate KrummStephens
Wins in straight setsβ€”71%
Wins a set when losingβ€”28%
Goes to a deciding setβ€”28%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteβ€”20%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogβ€”47%
Tiebreak sets wonβ€”50%
Wins after taking set 1β€”67%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1β€”56%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Date Krumm 0, Stephens 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Krumm

πŸƒ Pusher

Extreme retrievalLow error rateFrustrates opponentsDefensive baseline play
vs

Stephens

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

The βš™οΈ Grinder archetype wins about 70% vs πŸƒ Pusher across 1,378 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Sloane Stephens.

Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Sep 24, 2015

Seoul

H Hard Β· Round of 16

36
46
Stephens

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricKrummStephens
W-L-5–5
Avg odds-3.00
ROI %-+8.3%
Units P/L-+0.83u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricKrummStephens
Countriesβ€”3
Eventsβ€”3
Matchesβ€”6
Distanceβ€”913 mi Β· 1,469 km
Routeβ€”CAN β†’ POL β†’ ESP

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Krumm
LLWLWLWL
L

Aleksandra Krunic

Tokyo Β· Round of 32

06
06

Sep 13

L

Sloane Stephens

Seoul Β· Round of 16

36
46

Sep 24

W

Ajla Tomljanovic

Seoul Β· Round of 32

61
62

Sep 23

L

Ajla Tomljanovic

Tokyo Β· Round of 16

6577
36

Sep 17

W

Misaki Doi

Tokyo Β· Round of 32

64
62

Sep 16

L

Karolina Pliskova

Stanford Β· Round of 16

57
26

Aug 6

W

Sabine Lisicki

Stanford Β· Round of 32

16
7764
62

Aug 5

L

Dinah Pfizenmaier

Bogota Β· Round of 32

26
57

Apr 15

Stephens
LLWWLWLW
L

Mananchaya Sawangkaew

Philly Open - Philadelphia Β· 1st Round

64
26
26

Aug 25

L

Marta Kostyuk

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 3rd Round

57
57

Aug 18

W

Anastasia Potapova

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 2nd Round

62
64

Aug 17

W

Sinja Kraus

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 1st Round

75
63

Aug 15

L

Belinda Bencic

National Bank Open - Toronto Β· 2nd Round

36
16

Aug 5

W

Solana Sierra

National Bank Open - Toronto Β· 1st Round

63
64

Aug 4

L

Darja Vidmanova

The Memphis Classic - Memphis Β· 2nd Round

26
46

Jul 31

W

Yuliia Starodubtseva

The Memphis Classic - Memphis Β· 1st Round

64
57
62

Jul 29

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 25–25 matches

MetricKrummStephens
Matches won-28%
Sets won-33%
Games won-42%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageKrummStephens
WTA 25001

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceKrummStephens
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Kimiko Date Krumm vs Sloane Stephens FAQ

Sloane Stephens leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.