WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Seoul
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Krumm
🏃 Pusher
Tomljanovic
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 74% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,280 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Ajla Tomljanovic here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Krumm | Tomljanovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.97 |
| ROI % | - | -44.6% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.01u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Krumm
1
Tomljanovic
Sep 21, 2015
Seoul
H Hard · Round of 32
Sep 14, 2015
Tokyo
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Krumm | Tomljanovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 66.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 57.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 36.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 8.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 54.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 33.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 62.5% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 49.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 46.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kimiko Date Krumm and Ajla Tomljanovic face off in the Round of 32 at Seoul on Hard.
Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kimiko Date Krumm is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aleksandra Krunic (Sep 11).
Ajla Tomljanovic is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Veronika Erjavec (Jun 21).
Share this match
