ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Santa Fe
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Almeida
⚔️ The Gladiator
Ambrogi
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 54% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 3,919 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Almeida | Ambrogi |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–5 | 8–5 |
| Avg odds | 1.47 | 1.82 |
| ROI % | -15.3% | -4.3% |
| Units P/L | -1.68u | -0.56u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Almeida
0
Ambrogi
Jun 11, 2025
Santa Fe
C Clay · Round of 16
Oct 10, 2024
Villa Maria
C Clay · Round of 16
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Ambrogi has a higher win rate against shared opponents (38% vs Almeida's 25%).
| Opponent | Almeida | Ambrogi |
|---|---|---|
| Johan Alexander Rodriguez | L 57 46 | W 62 63 |
| Gonzalo Villanueva | L 57 46 | L 63 67 26 |
| Lucio Ratti | L 16 46 | W 75 64 |
| Alvaro Guillen Meza | L 57 36 | L 63 46 67 |
| Matias Soto | W 61 61 | L 36 16 |
| Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | L 46 26 | L 26 46 |
| Gonzalo Bueno | L 36 16 | W 62 61 |
| Tomas Barrios Vera | W 76 26 62 | L 46 26 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Almeida | Ambrogi |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.2% | 62% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 62.9% | 65.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48% | 53.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0.4 | 2.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.9% | 54.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 47.7% | 36.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 59.6% | 48.9% |
| BP Converted % | 53.9% | 43.4% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 8.5 | 16.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 29 | 37 |
| Net Pts Won % | 75% | 78.5% |
| Total Pts Won % | 54% | 50.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 69% | 70% |
Last five matches per player
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 16
Jun 11
Ryan Dickerson
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 32
Jun 9
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
M25 Cuiaba · Round of 16
Jun 1
Joao Victor Couto Loureiro
M25 Cuiaba · Round of 32
Jun 1
Guido Ivan Justo
CIT Open · Quarterfinals
Jun 14
Guido Ivan Justo
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Semifinals
Jun 13
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Final
Jun 13
Carlos Maria Zarate
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 16
Jun 11
Matchup overview
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida and Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi face off in the Round of 16 at Santa Fe on Clay.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Johan Alexander Rodriguez (Jun 12).
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Guido Ivan Justo (Jun 14).
Share this match
