ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ambrogi
⚔️ The Gladiator
Zarate
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
Both Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Carlos Maria Zarate are ⚔️ The Gladiator types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 4,864 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ambrogi | Zarate |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–4 | 2–3 |
| Avg odds | 1.91 | 2.28 |
| ROI % | +3.1% | -49.0% |
| Units P/L | +0.34u | -2.45u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ambrogi
0
Zarate
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Zarate has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Ambrogi's 50%).
| Opponent | Ambrogi | Zarate |
|---|---|---|
| Guido Ivan Justo | W 46 75 62 | W 64 16 76 |
| Juan Bautista Torres | W 61 57 64 | W 61 76 |
| Lautaro Midon | L 62 36 57 | L 46 26 |
| Franco Ribero | W 64 76 | W 76 46 76 |
| Benjamin Torrealba | W 62 64 | W 75 63 |
| Gianluca Cadenasso | L 16 46 | L 26 63 57 |
| Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | L 26 46 | L 26 26 |
| Santiago De La Fuente | W 62 62 | W 57 76 62 |
| Juan Estevez | L 26 67 | L 16 36 |
| Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva | L 46 26 | W 76 62 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ambrogi | Zarate |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.4% | 58.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.5% | 68.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50% | 49.4% |
| Aces / Match | 2.6 | 4.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 39.9% | 68.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.3% | 30.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49.7% | 58% |
| BP Converted % | 51.1% | 33.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 23.6 | 20 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 39 | 28.4 |
| Net Pts Won % | 67.5% | 61.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.9% | 51.9% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 40% |
Last five matches per player
Guido Ivan Justo
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Semifinals
Jun 13
Carlos Maria Zarate
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 16
Jun 11
Juan Sebastian Gomez
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 32
Jun 10
Guido Ivan Justo
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Córdoba · Round of 16
May 9
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Arklon Huertas Del Pino Cordova
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 16
Jun 11
Juan Bautista Torres
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 32
Jun 10
Valerio Aboian
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Córdoba · Round of 32
May 7
Ryan Dickerson
Bolivia Open · Round of 32
Apr 7
Matchup overview
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Carlos Maria Zarate face off in the Quarterfinals at AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman on Clay.
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Guido Ivan Justo (Jun 13).
Carlos Maria Zarate is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi (Jun 12).
Share this match
