ITF M15 · Quarterfinals · M15 Maanshan
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Agafonov
🪃 Counterpuncher
Yamanaka
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Egor Agafonov plays Taiyo Yamanaka.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Agafonov | Yamanaka |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–2 | 6–3 |
| Avg odds | 1.19 | 2.19 |
| ROI % | -43.0% | +45.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.72u | +4.09u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Agafonov
0
Yamanaka
Sep 8, 2025
M15 Maanshan
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Sep 1, 2025
M15 Maanshan
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Agafonov | Yamanaka |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 70.1% | 60% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 72% | 72.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.5% | 53.6% |
| Aces / Match | 4.8 | 5.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.8 | 1.9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 70% | 58% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 38.9% | 29.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.9% | 46.5% |
| BP Converted % | 35.8% | 46.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 54.6% | 50.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Egor Agafonov and Taiyo Yamanaka face off in the Quarterfinals at M15 Maanshan on Hard.
Egor Agafonov leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Egor Agafonov is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kacper Knitter (Jun 1).
Taiyo Yamanaka is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hoyoung Roh (Jun 18).
Share this match
