ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Chennai
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sweeny
🏃 Pusher
McCabe
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 🏃 Pusher archetype wins about 54% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 115 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Dane Sweeny here.
Pusher players often use extreme retrieval and low error rate to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sweeny | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–7 | 5–3 |
| Avg odds | 1.62 | 1.52 |
| ROI % | -24.6% | -10.6% |
| Units P/L | -3.69u | -0.85u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Sweeny
2
McCabe
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Sweeny | McCabe | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 or more | 87% | 13/15 | 75% | 6/8 |
| 3 or more | 67% | 10/15 | 63% | 5/8 |
| 5 or more | 27% | 4/15 | 63% | 5/8 |
| 10 or more | 7% | 1/15 | 50% | 4/8 |
| 15 or more | 7% | 1/15 | 13% | 1/8 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/8 |
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Sweeny has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs McCabe's 40%).
| Opponent | Sweeny | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Tung-Lin Wu | W 63 16 61 | W 26 63 62 |
| Alex Bolt | L 36 46 | L 57 67 |
| Rinky Hijikata | L 36 26 | L 67 26 |
| Beibit Zhukayev | L 76 26 26 | L 76 26 26 |
| Hiroki Moriya | L 57 67 | W 64 63 |
| Masamichi Imamura | W 63 62 | W 64 16 63 |
| Tristan Schoolkate | W 36 76 76 | L 63 67 26 |
| Cruz Hewitt | W 61 61 | L 26 16 |
| Pavle Marinkov | W 60 61 | W 62 76 |
| James Duckworth | W 76 57 76 | L 57 75 67 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Sweeny | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.5% | 66% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 62.5% | 71.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.2% | 49.8% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 7.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.4 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 49.9% | 60.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.9% | 21.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 47.7% | 44.3% |
| BP Converted % | 29.2% | 30% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 20.5 | 22.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 34 | 28.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 70.7% | 66.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.1% | 48.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 53% | 63% |
Last five matches per player
James McCabe
Gwangju Open · Round of 16
Apr 23
Tung-Lin Wu
Gwangju Open · Round of 32
Apr 21
Ilya Ivashka
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 32
Apr 14
Rinky Hijikata
Miami Open presented by Itau · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 16
Arthur Fery
Republica Dominicana Open - Copa Cap Cana · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 9
Dane Sweeny
Gwangju Open · Round of 16
Apr 23
Kaichi Uchida
Gwangju Open · Round of 32
Apr 21
Alex Bolt
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 32
Apr 14
Andre Ilagan
Yokkaichi Challenger · Round of 32
Mar 24
Jan Choinski
Qatar ExxonMobil Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 14
Matchup overview
Dane Sweeny and James McCabe face off in the Round of 16 at Chennai on Hard.
Dane Sweeny leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Dane Sweeny is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs James McCabe (Apr 23).
James McCabe is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Dane Sweeny (Apr 23).
Share this match
