ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Burnie 2
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sweeny
🏃 Pusher
McCabe
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 🏃 Pusher archetype wins about 54% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 115 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Dane Sweeny here.
Pusher players often use extreme retrieval and low error rate to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sweeny | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–7 | 5–3 |
| Avg odds | 1.62 | 1.52 |
| ROI % | -24.6% | -10.6% |
| Units P/L | -3.69u | -0.85u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Sweeny
2
McCabe
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Sweeny | McCabe | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 or more | 87% | 13/15 | 75% | 6/8 |
| 3 or more | 67% | 10/15 | 63% | 5/8 |
| 5 or more | 27% | 4/15 | 63% | 5/8 |
| 10 or more | 7% | 1/15 | 50% | 4/8 |
| 15 or more | 7% | 1/15 | 13% | 1/8 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/8 |
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Sweeny has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs McCabe's 40%).
| Opponent | Sweeny | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Tung-Lin Wu | W 63 16 61 | W 26 63 62 |
| Alex Bolt | L 36 46 | L 57 67 |
| Rinky Hijikata | L 36 26 | L 67 26 |
| Beibit Zhukayev | L 76 26 26 | L 76 26 26 |
| Hiroki Moriya | L 57 67 | W 64 63 |
| Masamichi Imamura | W 63 62 | W 64 16 63 |
| Tristan Schoolkate | W 36 76 76 | L 63 67 26 |
| Cruz Hewitt | W 61 61 | L 26 16 |
| Pavle Marinkov | W 60 61 | W 62 76 |
| James Duckworth | W 76 57 76 | L 57 75 67 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Sweeny | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.5% | 66% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 62.5% | 71.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.2% | 49.8% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 7.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.4 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 49.9% | 60.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.9% | 21.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 47.7% | 44.3% |
| BP Converted % | 29.2% | 30% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 20.5 | 22.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 34 | 28.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 70.7% | 66.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.1% | 48.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 53% | 63% |
Last five matches per player
James McCabe
Gwangju Open · Round of 16
Apr 23
Tung-Lin Wu
Gwangju Open · Round of 32
Apr 21
Ilya Ivashka
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 32
Apr 14
Rinky Hijikata
Miami Open presented by Itau · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 16
Arthur Fery
Republica Dominicana Open - Copa Cap Cana · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 9
Dane Sweeny
Gwangju Open · Round of 16
Apr 23
Kaichi Uchida
Gwangju Open · Round of 32
Apr 21
Alex Bolt
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 32
Apr 14
Andre Ilagan
Yokkaichi Challenger · Round of 32
Mar 24
Jan Choinski
Qatar ExxonMobil Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 14
Match summary
Dane Sweeny, ranked 134th, will face James McCabe, ranked 230th, in the Round of 16 of the Gwangju Open on April 20, 2026. This hard-court meeting takes place in South Korea and marks another encounter between two players who have met three times previously. The outdoor hard surface at Gwangju has proven competitive for both competitors in recent weeks.
Sweeny leads McCabe 2-1 in their head-to-head record after three meetings. Their rivalry has been closely contested, with each encounter reflecting the differing strengths of both players on varying surfaces and conditions. The direct history between them provides context for how each has adapted to the other's game.
Sweeny has won 1 of his last 5 matches and holds a 50 percent record over his last 10 matches on hard courts, standing at 10-10. McCabe has won 3 of his last 5 and maintains a 70 percent win rate over his last 10 matches, with a 12-8 hard-court record. Both players return to court just one day after their previous matches. McCabe has been more consistent in recent outings, while Sweeny is searching to build momentum.
Dane Sweeny constructs points methodically, relying on consistency and defensive positioning to wear down opponents across extended rallies. James McCabe brings a more well-rounded approach to the court, mixing aggressive shot selection with solid fundamentals. On hard courts specifically, McCabe has converted opportunities at a higher rate, though Sweeny's defensive tenacity has sustained his competitiveness throughout the season.
Share this match
