Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Dane Sweeny vs James McCabePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Dane Sweeny

🇦🇺Dane Sweeny

#122 · 25 yrs · R

2–2

4 meetings · sets 5–5

James McCabe

🇦🇺James McCabe

#242 · 23 yrs · R

4

Dane Sweeny and James McCabe have met 4 times since 2023; they are level 2–2. Their first meeting came at Chennai Challenger in 2023 on hard. On hard courts they are level 2–2. Across all meetings Sweeny has taken 5 sets to McCabe's 5. Their most recent meeting: James McCabe won at Gwangju Challenger (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorSweenyMcCabe
Wins in straight sets67%69%
Wins a set when losing50%33%
Goes to a deciding set38%32%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite61%46%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog68%58%
Tiebreak sets won65%47%
Wins after taking set 185%82%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 173%73%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Sweeny 1, McCabe 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Sweeny

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

McCabe

🤖 Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,470 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward James McCabe.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

4 career meetings, newest first

Apr 23, 2026

Gwangju Challenger

H Hard · 2nd Round

766
16
687
McCabe

Feb 9, 2024

Burnie 2 Challenger

H Hard · Quarterfinals

61
26
64
Sweeny

Jul 20, 2023

Granby Challenger

H Hard · 2nd Round

46
26
McCabe

Feb 15, 2023

Chennai Challenger

H Hard · 2nd Round

62
61
Sweeny

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days

OutcomeSweenyMcCabe
1 or more82%100%
3 or more46%100%
5 or more18%58%
10 or more0%17%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricSweenyMcCabe
W-L6–74–9
Avg odds2.451.90
ROI %+2.7%-48.1%
Units P/L+0.35u-6.25u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricSweenyMcCabe
Countries11
Events12
Matches12
Distance0 mi · 0 km—
RouteCANUSA

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Sweeny has a higher win rate against shared opponents (70% vs McCabe's 60%).

OpponentSweenyMcCabe
Duncan Chan
W
64
61
L
67
64
57
Bernard Tomic
W
57
63
62
L
67
46
Masamichi Imamura
W
63
62
W
64
76
Tomas Barrios Vera
W
46
64
76
06
62
W
61
76
Mark Lajal
L
57
36
W
76
76
Andre Ilagan
W
63
67
64
L
64
46
26
Tung-Lin Wu
W
63
16
61
W
75
76
Alex Bolt
L
36
46
L
57
67
Colin Sinclair
L
62
67
46
W
36
76
75
Matthew Dellavedova
W
62
61
W
62
67
63

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Sweeny
LLWLWLWW
L

Jesper de Jong

Quebec City Challenger · 1st Round

57
06

Aug 19

L

Daniel Milavsky

Vancouver Challenger · 2nd Round

36
16

Jul 29

W

Duncan Chan

Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round

64
61

Jul 29

L

Andres Martin

Bloomfield Hills Challenger · 1st Round

64
36
667

Jul 21

W

Tomas Barrios Vera

Wimbledon · 3rd Round Qualifying

46
64
7765
06
62

Jun 30

L

Grigor Dimitrov

Wimbledon - London · 1st Round

647
36
57

Jun 30

W

Darwin Blanch

Wimbledon · 2nd Round Qualifying

26
7967
40

Jun 29

W

Franco Roncadelli

Wimbledon · 1st Round Qualifying

64
62

Jun 22

McCabe
LLLLWLLL
L

Noah Zamora

M25 East Lansing · 1st Round

64
36
627

Aug 12

L

Dusan Lajovic

Lexington Challenger · 1st Round

36
765
36

Aug 4

L

Duncan Chan

Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round

657
64
57

Jul 22

L

Bernard Tomic

Lincoln Challenger · 2nd Round

627
46

Jul 16

W

Masamichi Imamura

Lincoln Challenger · 1st Round

64
766

Jul 15

L

Jason Jung

Newport Challenger · 1st Round

46
36

Jul 8

L

Roman Safiullin

Wimbledon · 1st Round Qualifying

36
6477

Jun 29

L

Remy Bertola

Lexus Nottingham Open · 2nd Round Qualifying

6377
46

Jun 14

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ Sweenylevel↓ McCabe

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 65–78 matches

MetricSweenyMcCabe
Matches won69%54%
Sets won63%53%
Games won55%51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageSweenyMcCabe
ATP Challenger Tour22

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceSweenyMcCabe
Hard22

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Dane Sweeny vs James McCabe FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 2–2 over 4 meetings.