ATP Masters 1000 · Round of 32 · ATP Masters 1000 Rome
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Karatsev
🎯 Baseliner
Medvedev
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 3,955 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Aslan Karatsev plays Daniil Medvedev.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Karatsev | Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.05 |
| ROI % | - | -10.5% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.36u |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Karatsev
1
Medvedev
May 2, 2023
ATP Masters 1000 Madrid
C Clay · Round of 16
Jun 22, 2022
Mallorca
G Grass · Round of 16
May 10, 2021
ATP Masters 1000 Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
Mar 17, 2016
Kazan
H Hard · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Karatsev | Medvedev |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.8% | 64.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 82.5% | 69.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 31.6% | 50.8% |
| Aces / Match | 11 | 4.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 3.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 75% | 62.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 50% | 32.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.5% | 54.5% |
| BP Converted % | 62.5% | 37.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 24.3 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 27.2 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 69% |
| Total Pts Won % | 61.1% | 51.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 56% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Aslan Karatsev and Daniil Medvedev face off in the Round of 32 at ATP Masters 1000 Rome on Clay.
Aslan Karatsev leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Aslan Karatsev is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Christian Djonov (Apr 13).
Daniil Medvedev is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Terence Atmane (Jun 17).
Share this match
