ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Grodzisk Mazowiecki
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cina
🪃 Counterpuncher
Karatsev
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 2,804 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Federico Cina plays Aslan Karatsev.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cina | Karatsev |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–8 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.33 | - |
| ROI % | -55.8% | - |
| Units P/L | -6.14u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Cina
0
Karatsev
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cina | Karatsev |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.9 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 69% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 28.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 56.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 41.6% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 19.7 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 32.3 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 69% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.8% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Jesper de Jong
Roland Garros · Round of 64
May 27
Reilly Opelka
Roland Garros · Round of 128
May 26
Alexis Galarneau
Roland Garros · 3rd Round Qualifying
May 21
Bernard Tomic
Roland Garros · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 20
Yosuke Watanuki
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 18
Matchup overview
Federico Cina and Aslan Karatsev face off in the Round of 16 at Grodzisk Mazowiecki on Hard.
Federico Cina leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Federico Cina is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jesper de Jong (May 27).
Aslan Karatsev is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Federico Cina (Aug 7).
Share this match
