Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Tatsuma Ito vs Yuta ShimizuPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Tatsuma Ito and Yuta Shimizu have met 3 times since 2018; Tatsuma Ito leads 2โ€“1. Their first meeting came at Kyoto in 2018 on hard. On hard courts Ito leads 2โ€“1. Across all meetings Ito has taken 4 sets to Shimizu's 2. Their most recent meeting: Yuta Shimizu won at Kobe (2023).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorItoShimizu
Wins in straight setsโ€”58%
Wins a set when losingโ€”36%
Goes to a deciding setโ€”39%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”38%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogโ€”62%
Tiebreak sets wonโ€”64%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”73%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”54%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 3 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ito 2, Shimizu 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Ito

๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Shimizu

โš™๏ธ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs โš™๏ธ Grinder across 1,211 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tatsuma Ito.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

3 career meetings, newest first

Nov 15, 2023

Kobe

H Hard ยท Round of 32

6678
36
Shimizu

Nov 10, 2018

Kobe

H Hard ยท Round of 16

7866
61
Ito

Feb 10, 2018

Kyoto

H Hard ยท Round of 32

62
63
Ito

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricItoShimizu
W-L-6โ€“6
Avg odds-2.04
ROI %-+8.2%
Units P/L-+0.98u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricItoShimizu
Countriesโ€”1
Eventsโ€”1
Matchesโ€”1
Distanceโ€”0 mi ยท 0 km
Routeโ€”GBR

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Ito
LLLWWLWL
L

Manas Dhamne

Francavilla al Mare ยท 1st Round Qualifying

36
16

May 5

L

Marco Cecchinato

Cagliari ยท 1st Round Qualifying

06
26

Apr 29

L

Hiroki Moriya

Yokkaichi ยท Round of 32

36
26

Nov 28

W

Ray Ho

Yokkaichi ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

7764
61

Nov 27

W

Hikaru Shiraishi

Yokkaichi ยท 1st Round Qualifying

63
64

Nov 26

L

Yuta Shimizu

Kobe ยท Round of 32

6678
36

Nov 15

W

Sanhui Shin

Matsuyama ยท 1st Round Qualifying

7764
63

Nov 5

L

Kiranpal Pannu

Winnipeg ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

57
64
16

Aug 14

Shimizu
LLWLWWLL
L

Anton Matusevich

Roehampton 1 Challenger ยท 1st Round

46
57

Aug 18

L

Johannus Monday

Winnipeg Challenger ยท 2nd Round

64
36
36

Jul 23

W

Liam Broady

Winnipeg Challenger ยท 1st Round

62
75

Jul 21

L

Justin Boulais

Granby Challenger ยท 2nd Round

57
16

Jul 15

W

Jay Friend

Granby challenger

62
46
62

Jul 14

W

Jay Dylan Hara Friend

Granby Challenger ยท 1st Round

62
46
62

Jul 13

L

Ryan Colby

M25 Laval ยท 1st Round

26
46

Jul 7

L

Michael Mmoh

Cary Challenger ยท 1st Round

637
657

Jun 30

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ ItoIto aheadโ†“ Shimizu

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 49โ€“49 matches

MetricItoShimizu
Matches won-49%
Sets won-49%
Games won-49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageItoShimizu
ATP Challenger Tour21

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceItoShimizu
Hard21

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Tatsuma Ito vs Yuta Shimizu FAQ

Tatsuma Ito leads the head-to-head 2โ€“1 over 3 meetings.