Mitchell Krueger vs Sam GrothPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Mitchell Krueger and Sam Groth have met 2 times since 2016; they are level 1–1. Their first meeting came at Seoul in 2016 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1–1. Across all meetings Krueger has taken 3 sets to Groth's 2. Their most recent meeting: Mitchell Krueger won at Tiburon (2017).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Krueger | Groth | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Mitchell Krueger | Sam Groth | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 50% | 11/22 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 36% | 9/25 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 43% | 20/47 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 36% | 9/25 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 52% | 11/21 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 32% | 8/25 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 81% | 17/21 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 52% | 11/21 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Krueger 1, Groth 0).
Previous meetings
2 career meetings, newest first
Sep 27, 2017
Tiburon
H Hard · Round of 32
May 11, 2016
Seoul
H Hard · Round of 32
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Krueger | Groth |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.61 | - |
| ROI % | +17.0% | - |
| Units P/L | +1.53u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Krueger | Groth |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 3 | — |
| Matches | 8 | — |
| Distance | 2,418 mi · 3,891 km | — |
| Route | USA | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Abedallah Shelbayh
Columbus Challenger · Semifinals
Oct 3
Keegan Smith
Columbus Challenger · Quarterfinals
Oct 2
Stefan Kozlov
Columbus Challenger · 2nd Round
Oct 1
Tyler Zink
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 28
Sebastian Gorzny
San Diego 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 22
Michael Zheng
Tiburon Challenger · Quarterfinals
Sep 18
Ryan Seggerman
Tiburon Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 17
Keegan Smith
Tiburon Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 15
Taylor Fritz
Australian Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 1
Yannick Hanfmann
Brisbane · 1st Round Qualifying
Dec 31
Jan Choinski
Las Vegas · Round of 16
Oct 12
Noah Rubin
Fairfield · Round of 32
Oct 11
Mikael Torpegaard
Las Vegas · Round of 32
Oct 9
Dominik Koepfer
Monterrey · Round of 16
Oct 5
Manuel Sanchez
Monterrey · Round of 32
Oct 4
Mitchell Krueger
Tiburon · Round of 32
Sep 27
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 47–47 matches
| Metric | Krueger | Groth |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 47% | - |
| Sets won | 46% | - |
| Games won | 51% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Krueger | Groth |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Krueger | Groth |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.