Mitchell Krueger vs Noah RubinPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

πΊπΈMitchell Krueger
#354 Β· 32 yrs Β· R
4 meetings Β· sets 3β6
πΊπΈNoah Rubin
Unranked
135wMitchell Krueger and Noah Rubin have met 4 times since 2016; Noah Rubin leads 3β1. Their first meeting came at Maui in 2016 on hard. On hard courts Rubin leads 3β0. 1 of their meetings has been a final, with Rubin leading those 1β0. Across all meetings Krueger has taken 3 sets to Rubin's 6. Their most recent meeting: Mitchell Krueger won at Newport (2021).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Krueger | Rubin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Mitchell Krueger | Noah Rubin | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 52% | 11/21 | β | |
| Wins a set when losing | 36% | 9/25 | β | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 41% | 19/46 | β | |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 36% | 10/28 | β | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 41% | 7/17 | β | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 22% | 5/23 | β | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 84% | 16/19 | β | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 58% | 11/19 | β | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β read with care. Head-to-head: 3 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Krueger 1, Rubin 2).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Krueger
πΉ Frontrunner
Rubin
βοΈ Grinder
Matchup analysis
πΉ Frontrunner vs βοΈ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 279 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
4 career meetings, newest first
Jul 11, 2021
Newport
G Grass Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 12, 2017
Launceston
H Hard Β· Final
Feb 1, 2017
Burnie
H Hard Β· Round of 32
Jan 17, 2016
Maui
H Hard Β· Round of 16
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Krueger | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4β5 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.55 | - |
| ROI % | -44.9% | - |
| Units P/L | -4.04u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Krueger | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | β |
| Events | 1 | β |
| Matches | 1 | β |
| Distance | 0 mi Β· 0 km | β |
| Route | JAM | β |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round
Aug 25
Alex Martinez
Lincoln Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 13
Gavin Young
Futures 2026
Jul 10
Gavin Young
M25 Dallas Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Oliver Okonkwo
M25 Dallas Β· 2nd Round
Jul 9
Ivan Mitric
Futures 2026
Jul 8
Aleksandar Mitric
M25 Dallas Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Dhakshineswar Suresh
Cary challenger
Jun 28
Denis Kudla
Cleveland Β· Round of 16
Jan 31
Matija Pecotic
Cleveland Β· Round of 32
Jan 30
Kyle Kang
Indian Wells 1 Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 14
Joao Domingues
Oeiras 1 Β· Round of 32
Jan 2
Vadym Ursu
Oeiras 1 Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Jan 1
Lucas Gerch
Oeiras 1 Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Dec 31
Taro Daniel
Washington Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 30
William Blumberg
Newport Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Jul 11
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 46β46 matches
| Metric | Krueger | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 46% | - |
| Sets won | 46% | - |
| Games won | 51% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Krueger | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| Finals | 0 | 1 |
| ATP 250 | 1 | 0 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 3 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Krueger | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 3 |
| Grass | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.