Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Karolina Pliskova vs Kimiko Date KrummPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Karolina Pliskova and Kimiko Date Krumm have met 1 time since 2015; Karolina Pliskova leads 1โ€“0. Across all meetings Pliskova has taken 2 sets to Krumm's 0. Their most recent meeting: Karolina Pliskova won at Stanford (2015).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorPliskovaDate Krumm
Wins in straight sets63%โ€”
Wins a set when losing33%โ€”
Goes to a deciding set35%โ€”
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favorite35%โ€”
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog57%โ€”
Tiebreak sets won78%โ€”
Wins after taking set 188%โ€”
Wins 2-0 after taking set 175%โ€”

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Pliskova 1, Date Krumm 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Pliskova

๐Ÿค– Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve
vs

Krumm

๐Ÿƒ Pusher

Extreme retrievalLow error rateFrustrates opponentsDefensive baseline play

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿค– Servebot archetype wins about 70% vs ๐Ÿƒ Pusher across 292 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Karolina Pliskova.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Aug 6, 2015

Stanford

H Hard ยท Round of 16

75
62
Pliskova

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricPliskovaKrumm
W-L6โ€“5-
Avg odds2.13-
ROI %-13.6%-
Units P/L-1.50u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricPliskovaKrumm
Countries2โ€”
Events2โ€”
Matches3โ€”
Distance411 mi ยท 662 kmโ€”
RouteCAN โ†’ POLโ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Pliskova
LLWLWLWW
L

Sara Bejlek

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati ยท 1st Round

06
26

Aug 14

L

Mirra Andreeva

National Bank Open - Toronto ยท 2nd Round

06
26

Aug 5

W

Oleksandra Oliynykova

National Bank Open - Toronto ยท 1st Round

64
64

Aug 3

L

Iga Swiatek

Wimbledon - London ยท 2nd Round

16
36

Jul 2

W

Tereza Valentova

Wimbledon - London ยท 1st Round

63
64

Jun 30

L

Marie Bouzkova

Lexus Nottingham Open - Nottingham ยท Semifinals

46
16

Jun 20

W

Talia Gibson

Lexus Nottingham Open - Nottingham ยท Quarterfinals

75
64

Jun 19

W

Caty Mcnally

Lexus Nottingham Open - Nottingham ยท 2nd Round

64
763

Jun 18

Krumm
LLWLWLWL
L

Aleksandra Krunic

Tokyo ยท Round of 32

06
06

Sep 13

L

Sloane Stephens

Seoul ยท Round of 16

36
46

Sep 24

W

Ajla Tomljanovic

Seoul ยท Round of 32

61
62

Sep 23

L

Ajla Tomljanovic

Tokyo ยท Round of 16

6577
36

Sep 17

W

Misaki Doi

Tokyo ยท Round of 32

64
62

Sep 16

L

Karolina Pliskova

Stanford ยท Round of 16

57
26

Aug 6

W

Sabine Lisicki

Stanford ยท Round of 32

16
7764
62

Aug 5

L

Dinah Pfizenmaier

Bogota ยท Round of 32

26
57

Apr 15

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 31โ€“31 matches

MetricPliskovaKrumm
Matches won61%-
Sets won58%-
Games won50%-

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StagePliskovaKrumm
WTA 50010

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfacePliskovaKrumm
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Karolina Pliskova vs Kimiko Date Krumm FAQ

Karolina Pliskova leads the head-to-head 1โ€“0 over 1 meetings.