Emilio Nava vs Henri SquirePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

πΊπΈEmilio Nava
#122 Β· 24 yrs Β· R
15w1 meeting Β· sets 2β0

π©πͺHenri Squire
#246 Β· 26 yrs Β· R
4wEmilio Nava and Henri Squire have met 1 time since 2026; Emilio Nava leads 1β0. Across all meetings Nava has taken 2 sets to Squire's 0. Their most recent meeting: Emilio Nava won at Bad Rappenau Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Nava | Squire | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Emilio Nava | Henri Squire | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 70% | 19/27 | 66% | 19/29 |
| Wins a set when losing | 35% | 7/20 | 33% | 10/30 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 32% | 15/47 | 34% | 20/59 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 52% | 16/31 | 39% | 13/33 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 53% | 8/15 | 58% | 14/24 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 39% | 9/23 | 39% | 11/28 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 82% | 23/28 | 88% | 21/24 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 68% | 19/28 | 79% | 19/24 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Nava 1, Squire 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nava
π€ Servebot
Squire
π₯ Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
π€ Servebot vs π₯ Big Hitter is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,932 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 6, 2026
Bad Rappenau Challenger
C Clay Β· Semifinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Nava | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5β6 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.86 |
| ROI % | - | -20.6% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.26u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Nava | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | β | 2 |
| Events | β | 2 |
| Matches | β | 2 |
| Distance | β | 789 mi Β· 1,270 km |
| Route | β | POL β FRA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Nava and Squire posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Nava | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Pedro Martinez | W 63 63 | W 76 64 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Ignacio Buse
Wimbledon - London Β· 1st Round
Jun 29
Hamish Stewart
Lexus Eastbourne Open - Eastbourne Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 20
Taro Daniel
Bratislava Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jun 11
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Bratislava Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 9
Henri Squire
Bad Rappenau Challenger Β· Semifinals
Jun 6
Guy Den Ouden
Bad Rappenau Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jun 5
Marko Topo
Bad Rappenau Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jun 3
Max Houkes
Bad Rappenau Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 1
Maxime Janvier
St. Tropez Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 20
Marco Cecchinato
Szczecin Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 15
Filip Misolic
Tulln Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 8
Filip Cristian Jianu
Como Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 1
David Jorda Sanchis
U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Tom Gentzsch
Hagen Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Alex Barrena
Hagen Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Aug 5
Federico Agustin Gomez
Hagen Challenger Β· 1st Round
Aug 4
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 51β59 matches
| Metric | Nava | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 55% | 49% |
| Sets won | 53% | 49% |
| Games won | 51% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Nava | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Nava | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.