Emilio Nava vs Tomas Barrios VeraPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Emilio Nava and Tomas Barrios Vera have met 6 times since 2020; Emilio Nava leads 4–2. Their first meeting came at Alicante in 2020 on hard. On clay courts Nava leads 3–0. On hard courts Vera leads 2–1. Nava has won the last 3 meetings. Across all meetings Nava has taken 8 sets to Vera's 6. Their most recent meeting: Emilio Nava won at Oeiras 4 Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Nava | Barrios Vera | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Emilio Nava | Tomas Barrios Vera | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 73% | 24/33 | 72% | 26/36 |
| Wins a set when losing | 36% | 8/22 | 37% | 10/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 31% | 17/55 | 32% | 20/63 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 18/36 | 50% | 19/38 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 53% | 8/15 | 38% | 6/16 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 44% | 11/25 | 48% | 11/23 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 82% | 28/34 | 92% | 33/36 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 71% | 24/34 | 72% | 26/36 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 4 of 6 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Nava 2, Barrios Vera 2).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nava
🤖 Servebot
Vera
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,470 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Emilio Nava.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
6 career meetings, newest first
May 14, 2026
Oeiras 4 Challenger
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Apr 11, 2025
Sarasota Challenger
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Mar 21, 2025
Asuncion Challenger
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Jan 1, 2025
Australian Open
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 24, 2023
US Open
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 1, 2020
Alicante
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Nava | Vera | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Emilio Nava | Tomas Barrios Vera | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 9/9 | 100% | 6/6 |
| 3 or more | 67% | 6/9 | 33% | 2/6 |
| 5 or more | 44% | 4/9 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 10 or more | 11% | 1/9 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/6 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Nava | Vera |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–2 | 2–7 |
| Avg odds | 1.45 | 1.79 |
| ROI % | -6.9% | -68.4% |
| Units P/L | -0.48u | -6.16u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Nava | Vera |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 1 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | MEX |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Nava has a higher win rate against shared opponents (70% vs Vera's 40%).
| Opponent | Nava | Vera |
|---|---|---|
| Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez | W 63 64 | L 67 26 |
| Pedro Boscardin Dias | W 75 36 61 | W 64 75 |
| Murkel Dellien | W 64 76 | L 46 36 |
| Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | W 75 63 | L 36 61 46 |
| Matteo Berrettini | W 63 64 | L 67 57 |
| Alejandro Tabilo | L 36 36 | L 57 36 |
| Gonzalo Bueno | W 62 63 | W 36 62 64 |
| Juan Carlos Prado Angelo | L 67 16 | W 64 61 |
| Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva | L 64 57 57 | W 76 76 |
| Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | W 63 64 | L 67 62 26 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Ignacio Buse
Wimbledon - London · 1st Round
Jun 29
Taro Daniel
Bratislava Challenger · 2nd Round
Jun 11
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Bratislava Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 9
Henri Squire
Bad Rappenau Challenger · Semifinals
Jun 6
Guy Den Ouden
Bad Rappenau Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jun 5
Marko Topo
Bad Rappenau Challenger · 2nd Round
Jun 3
Max Houkes
Bad Rappenau Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 1
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
French Open - Paris · 1st Round
May 25
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Cancun Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 20
Dylan Dietrich
Zug Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 21
Niels Visker
Bunschoten Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Ilia Simakin
Iasi Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 7
Dane Sweeny
Wimbledon · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jun 30
Marco Cecchinato
Wimbledon · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 29
Paul Jubb
Wimbledon · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 24
Benjamin Bonzi
Nottingham 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 15
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 59–64 matches
| Metric | Nava | Vera |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 58% | 56% |
| Sets won | 55% | 56% |
| Games won | 51% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Nava | Vera |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam | 1 | 1 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 3 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Nava | Vera |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 2 |
| Clay | 3 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.