Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Blake Mott vs Yuta ShimizuPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Blake Mott and Yuta Shimizu have met 2 times since 2024; Yuta Shimizu leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at Playford Challenger in 2024 on hard. On hard courts Shimizu leads 2–0. Shimizu has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Mott has taken 1 sets to Shimizu's 4. Their most recent meeting: Yuta Shimizu won at Sydney Challenger (2024).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorMottShimizu
Wins in straight sets—62%
Wins a set when losing—38%
Goes to a deciding set—38%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite—42%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog—67%
Tiebreak sets won—68%
Wins after taking set 1—77%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1—60%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Mott 0, Shimizu 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Mott

⚔️ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter
vs

Shimizu

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

⚔️ The Gladiator vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 233 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Oct 31, 2024

Sydney Challenger

H Hard · 2nd Round

16
75
36
Shimizu

Oct 22, 2024

Playford Challenger

H Hard · 1st Round

36
57
Shimizu

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricMottShimizu
W-L-5–5
Avg odds-1.91
ROI %--4.1%
Units P/L--0.41u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricMottShimizu
Countries—1
Events—1
Matches—2
Distance—0 mi · 0 km
Route—CHN

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Mott
LWWWLLWL
L

Oliver Tarvet

M25 Roehampton 2 · Quarterfinals

16
46

Aug 8

W

Patrick Brady

M25 Roehampton 2 · 2nd Round

26
62
64

Aug 7

W

Joe Leather

M25 Roehampton · Round of 32

64
71169

Aug 6

W

Joe Leather

M25 Roehampton 2 · 1st Round

64
769

Aug 5

L

Harry Wendelken

Glasgow · 1st Round Qualifying

06
46

Feb 16

L

Nicolai Budkov Kjaer

Nottingham · 2nd Round Qualifying

36
6577

Jan 6

W

James Story

Nottingham · 1st Round Qualifying

64
62

Jan 5

L

Yuta Shimizu

Sydney Challenger · 2nd Round

16
75
36

Oct 31

Shimizu
LWLLWWWL
L

Bernard Tomic

Jingshan Challenger · 2nd Round

75
26
657

Oct 2

W

Stefanos Sakellaridis

Jingshan Challenger · 1st Round

7611
62

Sep 29

L

Philip Sekulic

Phan Thiet 4 Challenger · 1st Round

26
62
57

Sep 15

L

Arthur Weber

Phan Thiet 3 Challenger · Semifinals

46
46

Sep 12

W

Hiroki Moriya

Phan Thiet 3 Challenger · Quarterfinals

57
75
763

Sep 11

W

Kasidit Samrej

Phan Thiet 3 Challenger · 2nd Round

64
64

Sep 9

W

Aditya Vishal Balsekar

Phan Thiet 3 Challenger · 1st Round

61
61

Sep 8

L

Anton Matusevich

Roehampton 1 Challenger · 1st Round

46
57

Aug 18

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ MottShimizu ahead↓ Shimizu

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 55–55 matches

MetricMottShimizu
Matches won-53%
Sets won-52%
Games won-50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageMottShimizu
ATP Challenger Tour02

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceMottShimizu
Hard02

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Blake Mott vs Yuta Shimizu FAQ

Yuta Shimizu leads the head-to-head 2–0 over 2 meetings.