Andre Ghem vs Hernan CasanovaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Andre Ghem and Hernan Casanova have met 1 time since 2017; Andre Ghem leads 1–0. Across all meetings Ghem has taken 2 sets to Casanova's 0. Their most recent meeting: Andre Ghem won at Campinas (2017).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Ghem | Casanova | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Andre Ghem | Hernan Casanova | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 75% | 24/32 | |
| Wins a set when losing | — | 44% | 7/16 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | — | 31% | 15/48 | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 50% | 15/30 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 73% | 8/11 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 64% | 7/11 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 88% | 29/33 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 73% | 24/33 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ghem 1, Casanova 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ghem
🧱 The Wall
Casanova
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
🧱 The Wall vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 383 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Oct 5, 2017
Campinas
C Clay · Round of 16
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ghem | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 4–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.72 |
| ROI % | - | -46.3% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.70u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Ghem | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 835 mi · 1,344 km |
| Route | — | ARG → BRA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Thiago Monteiro
Rio de Janeiro · Round of 32
Nov 11
Fabiano De Paula
Rio de Janeiro · 2nd Round Qualifying
Nov 3
Claudio Kligerman
Rio de Janeiro · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 2
Taro Daniel
Canberra 2 · Round of 32
Nov 1
Bradley Mousley
Traralgon · Round of 32
Oct 12
Gastao Elias
Campinas · Quarterfinals
Oct 6
Hernan Casanova
Campinas · Round of 16
Oct 5
Christian Oliveira
Campinas · Round of 32
Oct 4
Alexandre Bobiere
Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Bernardo Munk Mesa
Antofagasta Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Wilson Leite
Antofagasta Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 4
Gustavo Heide
Curitiba Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 29
Murkel Dellien
Buenos Aires Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 22
Flynn Thomas
M25 Muttenz · 1st Round
Aug 11
Yannick Theodor Alexandrescou
Plovdiv 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 4
Carlos Lopez Montagud
M25 Denia · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 48–48 matches
| Metric | Ghem | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 67% |
| Sets won | - | 64% |
| Games won | - | 55% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Ghem | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Ghem | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.