ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Cassis
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Piros
⚙️ Grinder
Atmane
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Terence Atmane here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Piros | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–6 | 5–10 |
| Avg odds | 1.61 | 2.47 |
| ROI % | -3.7% | -30.6% |
| Units P/L | -0.67u | -4.59u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Piros
1
Atmane
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Piros has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Atmane's 0%).
| Opponent | Piros | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Dino Prizmic | L 36 26 | L 46 36 |
| James Duckworth | W 61 46 62 | L 67 26 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Piros | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.4% | 64.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 67.6% | 78.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.2% | 52.1% |
| Aces / Match | 3.4 | 6.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 2.2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 61.1% | 54% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.9% | 23% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.4% | 45.9% |
| BP Converted % | 44.9% | 33.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.4 | 22.9 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.7 | 26.3 |
| Net Pts Won % | 80% | 74% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50% | 49.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Zsombor Piros and Terence Atmane face off in the Round of 16 at Cassis on Hard.
Zsombor Piros leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Zsombor Piros is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Taro Daniel (Jun 12).
Terence Atmane is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gabriel Diallo (Jun 22).
Share this match
