ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Iasi
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Atmane
🤖 Servebot
Piros
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Terence Atmane here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Atmane | Piros |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–10 | 12–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.47 | 1.61 |
| ROI % | -30.6% | -3.7% |
| Units P/L | -4.59u | -0.67u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Atmane
1
Piros
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Piros has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Atmane's 0%).
| Opponent | Atmane | Piros |
|---|---|---|
| Dino Prizmic | L 46 36 | L 36 26 |
| James Duckworth | L 67 26 | W 61 46 62 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Atmane | Piros |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.8% | 61.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 78.4% | 67.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52.1% | 50.2% |
| Aces / Match | 6.8 | 3.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54% | 61.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 23% | 31.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.9% | 48.4% |
| BP Converted % | 33.2% | 44.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.9 | 22.4 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.3 | 28.7 |
| Net Pts Won % | 74% | 80% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.6% | 50% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 36% | 65% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Terence Atmane and Zsombor Piros face off in the Round of 32 at Iasi on Clay.
Terence Atmane leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Terence Atmane is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gabriel Diallo (Jun 22).
Zsombor Piros is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Taro Daniel (Jun 12).
Share this match
