Yuta ShimizuvsBenjamin Hassan

November 23, 2024H Hard

Match Result

Final score & match stats

#353Yuta Shimizu

#442Benjamin Hassan

ShimizuHassan

1st Serve %76%66%

1st Serve Won71%68%

2nd Serve Won44%35%

Serve Pts Won65%57%

BP Saved6/63/6

Return Pts Won43%35%

Total Pts Won55%45%

Aces29

Double Faults02

Archetype Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Shimizu

🛡️ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents

Hassan

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

🛡️ The Spoiler vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,642 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Yuta Shimizu plays Benjamin Hassan.

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

Metric	Shimizu	Hassan
W-L	9–7	5–3
Avg odds	1.95	2.18
ROI %	+3.9%	+51.9%
Units P/L	+0.62u	+4.15u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Head-to-Head

Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting

Shimizu

Hassan

Nov 23, 2024

Yokohama

H Hard · Semifinals

Shimizu

Full head-to-head & rivalry stats

Common Opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 6 shared opponents, both Shimizu and Hassan posted a 33% win rate.

Opponent	Shimizu	Hassan
Andre Ilagan	L 64 67 46	L 46 75 46
Daniel Michalski	L 26 62 36	L 36 75 57
Andres Martin	W 76 76	W 67 75 63
Nicolas Mejia	W 64 62	W 64 63
Marek Gengel	L 63 16 46	L 46 63 26
Martin Damm	L 67 46	L 57 67

Mechanics

Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days

Stat	Shimizu	Hassan
Serve
1st Serve In %	59.8%	54.2%
1st Serve Pts Won %	66.2%	68.9%
2nd Serve Pts Won %	49.9%	54.3%
Aces / Match	4.5	3.7
Double Faults / Match	3.1	3.2
Break Points Saved %	66.4%	50.8%
Return
1st Return Pts Won %	27.4%	31.8%
2nd Return Pts Won %	44.9%	55.1%
BP Converted %	32.4%	45.8%
Rally
Winners / Match	5.5	21.7
Unforced Errors / Match	19	44.3
Net Pts Won %	35.7%	49.2%
Total Pts Won %	47.2%	50.6%
Surface (Hard)
Hard Win %	58%	0%