ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Bendigo
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kopriva
⚙️ Grinder
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 👑 The Complete Package is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Vit Kopriva plays Cem Ilkel.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kopriva | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–9 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.84 | 3.61 |
| ROI % | +5.9% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +0.94u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Kopriva
1
Ilkel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kopriva | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.5% | 53.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 62.4% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.3% | 51.2% |
| Aces / Match | 3.2 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.6 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.5% | 71.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 28.7% | 41.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50.1% | 46.4% |
| BP Converted % | 36.7% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 16.4 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 25.7 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 63.3% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.8% | 53.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Alexander Zverev
Terra Wortmann Open · Round of 32
Jun 16
Vitaliy Sachko
Unicredit Czech Open · Round of 16
Jun 4
Andrej Martin
Unicredit Czech Open · Round of 32
Jun 2
Martin Landaluce
Roland Garros · Round of 64
May 28
Corentin Moutet
Roland Garros · Round of 128
May 26
Matchup overview
Vit Kopriva and Cem Ilkel face off in the Round of 32 at Bendigo on Hard.
Vit Kopriva leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Vit Kopriva is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexander Zverev (Jun 16).
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Share this match
