ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Quimper
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Kopriva
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Vit Kopriva.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 7–9 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 2.84 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | +5.9% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | +0.94u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
1
Ilkel
3
Kopriva
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 63.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 62.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 47.3% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 3.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 2.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 51.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 28.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 50.1% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 36.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 16.4 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 25.7 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 63.3% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 46.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Alexander Zverev
Terra Wortmann Open · Round of 32
Jun 16
Vitaliy Sachko
Unicredit Czech Open · Round of 16
Jun 4
Andrej Martin
Unicredit Czech Open · Round of 32
Jun 2
Martin Landaluce
Roland Garros · Round of 64
May 28
Corentin Moutet
Roland Garros · Round of 128
May 26
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Vit Kopriva face off in the Quarterfinals at Quimper on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 1-3 over 4 previous meetings.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Vit Kopriva is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexander Zverev (Jun 16).
Share this match
