WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Gstaad
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bacsinszky
🎾 All-Court
Tormo
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
🎾 All-Court vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 450 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Timea Bacsinszky plays Sara Sorribes Tormo.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bacsinszky | Tormo |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 6–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.86 |
| ROI % | - | +8.9% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.89u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Bacsinszky
0
Tormo
May 29, 2017
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 128
Jul 11, 2016
Gstaad
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Bacsinszky | Tormo |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 83.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 38.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 57.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 54.5% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 52.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 55.9% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 67% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Timea Bacsinszky and Sara Sorribes Tormo face off in the Round of 32 at Gstaad on Clay.
Timea Bacsinszky leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Timea Bacsinszky is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kristie Ahn (Sep 16).
Sara Sorribes Tormo is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Maria Timofeeva (Jun 6).
Share this match
