Grand Slam · Round of 128 · Wimbledon
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Bacsinszky
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 68% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 437 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Timea Bacsinszky here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Grass, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Stephens
0
Bacsinszky
Jul 1, 2019
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 128
Apr 20, 2019
Fed Cup WG R1: USA vs SUI
H Hard · Round Robin
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Grass) | ||
| Grass Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Timea Bacsinszky face off in the Round of 128 at Wimbledon on Grass.
Sloane Stephens leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Timea Bacsinszky is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kristie Ahn (Sep 16).
Share this match
