ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Ostra Group Open By Porsche Servisni Centrum Ostrava
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Wild
🎯 Baseliner
Gombos
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 1,851 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Thiago Seyboth Wild here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Wild | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–5 | 8–9 |
| Avg odds | 2.24 | 2.41 |
| ROI % | -40.7% | -29.4% |
| Units P/L | -3.66u | -5.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Wild
0
Gombos
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Gombos has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Wild's 0%).
| Opponent | Wild | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Francesco Maestrelli | L 67 46 | W 61 67 64 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Wild | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.2% | 57.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.4% | 74.9% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.8% | 50.8% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 3.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.7% | 53.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.3% | 33.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53% | 48.7% |
| BP Converted % | 38.5% | 45.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 26.6 | 18.6 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 27.4 | 34.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 76% | 56.9% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.8% | 52.3% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 45% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Match summary
Thiago Seyboth Wild meets Norbert Gombos in the Round of 32 at the Ostra Group Open By Porsche Servisni Centrum Ostrava on April 28. The match takes place on outdoor clay, where Seyboth Wild ranks 238th and Gombos sits at 339th.
Seyboth Wild and Gombos have never played. Over a recent clay sample, Gombos compiled a 12-8 record at 60%, while Seyboth Wild stands at 9-11 and 45%. Both men won 60% of their matches in the last five days, though Gombos arrives on a two-match streak after playing yesterday; Seyboth Wild is one match into a loss and last competed 12 days ago.
Seyboth Wild constructs points across the court with flexibility to serve and volley or stay baseline-oriented depending on the rally. Gombos plays as a counterpuncher, reading and redirecting opponent pace rather than driving the tempo himself. On clay, Gombos has built recent success with the surface and the patience it demands; Seyboth Wild has struggled there, requiring sharper shot-making and court movement. Seyboth Wild must establish his all-court gameplan early, while Gombos will work to settle into rhythm and capitalize on mistakes.
Share this match
