Grand Slam · 2nd Round Qualifying · Roland Garros
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nava
💥 Big Hitter
Wild
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 1,439 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Emilio Nava here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Nava | Wild |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–10 | 3–3 |
| Avg odds | 2.06 | 1.35 |
| ROI % | -14.0% | -31.2% |
| Units P/L | -2.94u | -1.87u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Nava
0
Wild
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Nava has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Wild's 25%).
| Opponent | Nava | Wild |
|---|---|---|
| Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | W 75 63 | L 57 64 26 |
| Alex Barrena | W 63 63 | W 61 60 |
| Daniel Dutra da Silva | W 62 64 | L 67 46 |
| Mikhail Kukushkin | W 75 62 | L 64 46 36 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Nava | Wild |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62% | 64% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 72% | 68.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.7% | 47% |
| Aces / Match | 6.4 | 5.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.4 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.2% | 58.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.4% | 29.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 44.9% | 50.7% |
| BP Converted % | 42.4% | 34.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 23.8 | 26.6 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 31.9 | 27.4 |
| Net Pts Won % | 73% | 76% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.2% | 48.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 57% | 43% |
Last five matches per player
Emilio Nava
Roland Garros · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 24
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 24
Daniel Elahi Galan
Zagreb Open · Round of 32
May 7
Ryan Seggerman
Abruzzo Open Francavilla al Mare · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 4
Nerman Fatic
Ostra Group Open By Porsche Servisni Centrum Ostrava · Round of 16
Apr 30
Match summary
Emilio Nava and Thiago Seyboth Wild meet in the 2nd Round Qualifying of Roland Garros on May 20 on outdoor clay. Nava, ranked 97th, has played five matches in 14 days and sits just four days removed from his most recent match. Seyboth Wild, ranked 294th, has been less active and comes in after a seven-day layoff.
The two have never faced each other. Nava won 4 of his last 5 matches overall, though he lost his most recent encounter. Seyboth Wild has won just one of five and is currently on a three-match losing streak. Against common opponents, Nava defeated Adolfo Daniel Vallejo and Daniel Dutra da Silva while Seyboth Wild lost to both; Seyboth Wild's bright spot came against Nuno Borges, where he won while Nava fell.
Nava hits hard off both wings and dictates from the baseline. Thiago Seyboth Wild operates across multiple zones and adjusts his approach based on the opponent. On clay, Nava has won 12 of 20 matches at 60%, while Seyboth Wild has won 8 of 20 at 40%. The match will test whether Nava can sustain his recent rhythm on the surface, or whether Seyboth Wild's court flexibility can disrupt a game built on heavy striking.
Share this match