WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Prague
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Korpatsch
🪃 Counterpuncher
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tamara Korpatsch here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Korpatsch | Schmiedlova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–8 | - |
| Avg odds | 4.01 | - |
| ROI % | -21.5% | - |
| Units P/L | -2.79u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Korpatsch
1
Schmiedlova
Jul 17, 2023
Budapest
C Clay · Round of 16
Apr 29, 2019
Prague
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Korpatsch | Schmiedlova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.3% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 40.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.7% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 55.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 43.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 63% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tamara Korpatsch and Anna Karolina Schmiedlova face off in the Round of 16 at Prague on Clay.
Tamara Korpatsch leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Tamara Korpatsch is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Camelia Begu (Jun 20).
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Share this match
