WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Budapest
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Korpatsch
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tamara Korpatsch here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Korpatsch |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 4.01 |
| ROI % | - | -21.5% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.79u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Schmiedlova
1
Korpatsch
Jul 17, 2023
Budapest
C Clay · Round of 16
Apr 29, 2019
Prague
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Korpatsch |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 62.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 52.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 40.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 52.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 31.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 55.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 56.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 43.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 63% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Tamara Korpatsch face off in the Round of 16 at Budapest on Clay.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Tamara Korpatsch is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Camelia Begu (Jun 20).
Share this match
