WTA 250 · Final · Acapulco
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Cibulkova
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 496 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Dominika Cibulkova here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Cibulkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Stephens
2
Cibulkova
Oct 1, 2018
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 16
Aug 28, 2017
US Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Feb 22, 2016
Acapulco
H Hard · Final
Aug 10, 2015
Toronto
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Cibulkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Dominika Cibulkova face off in the Final at Acapulco on Hard.
Sloane Stephens leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Dominika Cibulkova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aryna Sabalenka (May 27).
Share this match
