WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cibulkova
🏹 Frontrunner
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 496 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Dominika Cibulkova here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cibulkova | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.74 |
| ROI % | - | -68.2% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.41u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Cibulkova
2
Stephens
Oct 1, 2018
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 16
Aug 28, 2017
US Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Feb 22, 2016
Acapulco
H Hard · Final
Aug 10, 2015
Toronto
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cibulkova | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 46.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 56.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 25.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 39.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 49.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 40.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Dominika Cibulkova and Sloane Stephens face off in the Round of 16 at Beijing on Hard.
Dominika Cibulkova leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Dominika Cibulkova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aryna Sabalenka (May 27).
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Share this match
