ITF M25 Β· Quarterfinals Β· M25 Champaign IL
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Jubb
π The Complete Package
Kang
πͺ Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
π The Complete Package vs πͺ Counterpuncher is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,062 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Paul Jubb plays Kyle Kang.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Jubb | Kang |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5β6 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.62 | - |
| ROI % | -26.3% | - |
| Units P/L | -2.89u | - |
Prior meetings and scores Β· 1 career meeting
1
Jubb
0
Kang
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Jubb | Kang |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.7 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.6% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 53.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21.8 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 47.5 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 68.2% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.3% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 57% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Rio Noguchi
Dublin Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 14
Tristan Schoolkate
Lexus Ilkley Open Β· Round of 32
Jun 10
Mark Lajal
Lexus Ilkley Open Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 8
Max Basing
Lexus Ilkley Open Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 8
Patrick Brady
M25 Nottingham Β· Round of 32
May 4
Matchup overview
Paul Jubb and Kyle Kang face off in the Quarterfinals at M25 Champaign IL on Hard.
Paul Jubb leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Paul Jubb is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Rio Noguchi (Jun 14).
Kyle Kang is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hady Habib (Aug 5).
Share this match