Kyle Kang vs Paul JubbPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Kyle Kang and Paul Jubb have met 1 time since 2025; Paul Jubb leads 1–0. Across all meetings Kang has taken 0 sets to Jubb's 2. Their most recent meeting: Paul Jubb won at M25 Champaign 1 (2025).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kang | Jubb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Kyle Kang | Paul Jubb | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 76% | 25/33 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/1 | 48% | 10/21 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 0% | 0/1 | 33% | 18/54 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 51% | 20/39 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 0% | 0/1 | 55% | 6/11 |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 59% | 13/22 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 93% | 28/30 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 83% | 25/30 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kang 0, Jubb 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kang
⚔️ The Gladiator
Jubb
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
⚔️ The Gladiator vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,935 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 25, 2025
M25 Champaign 1
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kang | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 4–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.08 |
| ROI % | - | -21.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.11u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kang | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | JAM |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Sanhui Shin
M15 Gimcheon 2 · 1st Round
Nov 26
Hady Habib
Chicago Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 5
Aidan McHugh
M25 Edwardsville 1 · Final
Aug 3
Aidan Kim
M25 Edwardsville 1 · Semifinals
Aug 2
Tyler Zink
M25 Edwardsville 1 · Quarterfinals
Aug 1
Nathan Ponwith
M25 Edwardsville 1 · 2nd Round
Jul 31
Victor Lilov
M25 Edwardsville IL · Round of 32
Jul 30
Paul Jubb
M25 Champaign 1 · Quarterfinals
Jul 25
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Elias Ymer
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 17
Christoph Negritu
Bundesliga - men
Jul 12
Khumoyun Sultanov
M25 Marburg · 2nd Round
Jul 2
Karl Friberg
Futures 2026
Jul 1
Karl Friberg
M25 Marburg · 1st Round
Jul 1
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Wimbledon · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 29
Tomas Barrios Vera
Wimbledon · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 24
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 1–54 matches
| Metric | Kang | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 61% |
| Sets won | 0% | 60% |
| Games won | 29% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kang | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kang | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.