ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Bratislava
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gombos
🪃 Counterpuncher
Karatsev
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 1,829 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Aslan Karatsev here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Gombos | Karatsev |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–9 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.15 | - |
| ROI % | -29.4% | - |
| Units P/L | -5.00u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Gombos
0
Karatsev
Feb 5, 2019
Budapest
H Hard · Round of 64
Nov 11, 2015
Bratislava
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Gombos | Karatsev |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57% | 67.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 75.2% | 82.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.9% | 31.6% |
| Aces / Match | 4.5 | 11 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.1 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54.4% | 75% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.3% | 50% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.4% | 61.5% |
| BP Converted % | 42.8% | 62.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 17.3 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 30.9 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 55.1% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.9% | 61.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 100% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Norbert Gombos and Aslan Karatsev face off in the Round of 32 at Bratislava on Hard.
Norbert Gombos leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Norbert Gombos is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dalibor Svrcina (Jun 17).
Aslan Karatsev is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Christian Djonov (Apr 13).
Share this match
