WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Osaka
💥 Big Hitter
Diyas
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 5,392 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Naomi Osaka here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Osaka | Diyas |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.22 | - |
| ROI % | +57.8% | - |
| Units P/L | +9.25u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Osaka
0
Diyas
Oct 1, 2018
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 64
May 28, 2018
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Osaka | Diyas |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 65.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.7 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 55.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 67.3% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.8% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Naomi Osaka and Zarina Diyas face off in the Round of 64 at Beijing on Hard.
Naomi Osaka leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Naomi Osaka is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Ekaterina Alexandrova (Jun 25).
Zarina Diyas is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Paula Badosa (Jan 19).
Share this match
