WTA 250 · Semifinals · Auckland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Osaka
💥 Big Hitter
Parks
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Naomi Osaka plays Alycia Parks.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Osaka | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–3 | 5–10 |
| Avg odds | 2.22 | 2.60 |
| ROI % | +57.8% | -15.2% |
| Units P/L | +9.25u | -2.28u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Osaka
0
Parks
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Osaka has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Parks's 40%).
| Opponent | Osaka | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Iva Jovic | W | L 36 26 |
| Leylah Fernandez | W 46 75 63 | W 64 64 |
| Diana Shnaider | W 61 62 | W 16 64 76 |
| Coco Gauff | W 63 62 | L 63 06 16 |
| Karolina Muchova | W 64 76 | L 64 46 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Osaka | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.6% | 54.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 65.3% | 67.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.8% | 47.8% |
| Aces / Match | 3.7 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 4.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.5% | 55.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.8% | 33.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 55.4% | 50.8% |
| BP Converted % | 67.3% | 46.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.8% | 49.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Naomi Osaka and Alycia Parks face off in the Semifinals at Auckland on Hard.
Naomi Osaka leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Naomi Osaka is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Ekaterina Alexandrova (Jun 25).
Alycia Parks is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Emiliana Arango (Jun 20).
Share this match
