WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Auckland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Broady
🤖 Servebot
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 59% vs 🤖 Servebot across 2,242 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the servebot's high ace rate. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Broady | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 11–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.76 |
| ROI % | - | +0.7% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.11u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Broady
1
Ostapenko
Jan 4, 2016
Auckland
H Hard · Round of 16
Sep 14, 2015
Quebec City
H Hard · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Broady | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 58.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 66.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 43.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 7.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 58.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 41.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 56.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 53% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Naomi Broady and Jelena Ostapenko face off in the Round of 16 at Auckland on Hard.
Naomi Broady leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Naomi Broady is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Petra Martic (Sep 10).
Jelena Ostapenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zeynep Sonmez (Jun 25).
Share this match
