WTA 250 · Semifinals · Quebec City
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Broady
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 59% vs 🤖 Servebot across 2,242 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the servebot's high ace rate. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ostapenko | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.76 | - |
| ROI % | +0.7% | - |
| Units P/L | +0.11u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Ostapenko
1
Broady
Jan 4, 2016
Auckland
H Hard · Round of 16
Sep 14, 2015
Quebec City
H Hard · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ostapenko | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 7.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jelena Ostapenko and Naomi Broady face off in the Semifinals at Quebec City on Hard.
Jelena Ostapenko leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Jelena Ostapenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zeynep Sonmez (Jun 25).
Naomi Broady is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Petra Martic (Sep 10).
Share this match
