ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Istanbul
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Safwat
⚙️ Grinder
Wild
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,419 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Thiago Seyboth Wild here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Safwat | Wild |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 4–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.24 |
| ROI % | - | -40.7% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.66u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Safwat
0
Wild
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Safwat | Wild |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 66.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 51.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 29.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 53% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 38.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 19 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 18 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 42.9% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 49.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Mohamed Safwat and Thiago Seyboth Wild face off in the Round of 32 at Istanbul on Hard.
Mohamed Safwat leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Mohamed Safwat is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Gretskiy (Sep 1).
Thiago Seyboth Wild is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Luis Felipe Miguel (Jun 25).
Share this match
