ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Quanzhou
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Marterer
⚙️ Grinder
O'Connell
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Christopher O'Connell here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Marterer | O'Connell |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.36 |
| ROI % | - | -25.3% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.04u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Marterer
2
O'Connell
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Marterer and O'Connell posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Marterer | O'Connell |
|---|---|---|
| Kyrian Jacquet | L 16 76 16 | L 36 16 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Marterer | O'Connell |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 59.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 7.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 24.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 43.2% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 54% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 26.1 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 29.2 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 61.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 46.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Maximilian Marterer and Christopher O'Connell face off in the Round of 16 at Quanzhou on Hard.
Maximilian Marterer leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Maximilian Marterer is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Christoph Negritu (Aug 19).
Christopher O'Connell is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Otto Virtanen (Jun 19).
Share this match
