ATP Masters 1000 · Round of 64 · ATP Masters 1000 Rome
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cecchinato
⚙️ Grinder
Edmund
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Marco Cecchinato plays Kyle Edmund.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cecchinato | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–9 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | - |
| ROI % | -29.1% | - |
| Units P/L | -5.52u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Cecchinato
1
Edmund
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cecchinato | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.1% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 55.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 59% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 50.7% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 25.6 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.6 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 68.4% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 57% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Luca Van Assche
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Quarterfinals
Jun 18
Federico Bondioli
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Round of 16
Jun 17
Jesper de Jong
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Alvaro Guillen Meza
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 16
Jun 11
Petr Nesterov
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 32
Jun 9
Matchup overview
Marco Cecchinato and Kyle Edmund face off in the Round of 64 at ATP Masters 1000 Rome on Clay.
Marco Cecchinato leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Marco Cecchinato is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Luca Van Assche (Jun 18).
Kyle Edmund is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jack Pinnington Jones (Jul 13).
Share this match
