ATP 250 · 2nd Round Qualifying · Nice
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Edmund
💥 Big Hitter
Cecchinato
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Kyle Edmund plays Marco Cecchinato.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Edmund | Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 10–9 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.14 |
| ROI % | - | -29.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -5.52u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Edmund
1
Cecchinato
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Edmund | Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 64.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.2% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 59% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 35% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 52.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 50.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 25.6 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 28.6 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 68.4% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 52.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 57% |
Last five matches per player
Luca Van Assche
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Quarterfinals
Jun 18
Federico Bondioli
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Round of 16
Jun 17
Jesper de Jong
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Alvaro Guillen Meza
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 16
Jun 11
Petr Nesterov
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 32
Jun 9
Matchup overview
Kyle Edmund and Marco Cecchinato face off in the 2nd Round Qualifying at Nice on Clay.
Kyle Edmund leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kyle Edmund is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jack Pinnington Jones (Jul 13).
Marco Cecchinato is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Luca Van Assche (Jun 18).
Share this match
