WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Cincinnati
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Keys
💥 Big Hitter
Bacsinszky
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 1,018 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Madison Keys here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Keys | Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 14–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.38 | - |
| ROI % | +98.0% | - |
| Units P/L | +17.64u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Keys
1
Bacsinszky
Aug 17, 2015
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 64
May 25, 2015
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Keys | Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 5.2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 43.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Madison Keys and Timea Bacsinszky face off in the Round of 64 at Cincinnati on Hard.
Madison Keys leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Madison Keys is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Mccartney Kessler (Jun 25).
Timea Bacsinszky is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kristie Ahn (Sep 16).
Share this match