WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Keys
💥 Big Hitter
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 74% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,306 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Madison Keys here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Keys | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–4 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.13 | 1.35 |
| ROI % | +68.4% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +10.94u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Keys
1
Mladenovic
Oct 3, 2016
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 32
Aug 8, 2016
Olympics
H Hard · Round of 32
Oct 5, 2015
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 64
Sep 28, 2015
Wuhan
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Keys | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 5.2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 43.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Madison Keys and Kristina Mladenovic face off in the Round of 32 at Beijing on Hard.
Madison Keys leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Madison Keys is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jessica Pegula (Jun 19).
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Share this match
