WTA 1000 · Semifinals · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Keys
💥 Big Hitter
Muguruza
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,362 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Madison Keys plays Garbine Muguruza.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Keys | Muguruza |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.13 | - |
| ROI % | +68.4% | - |
| Units P/L | +10.94u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Keys
1
Muguruza
Aug 12, 2019
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 64
Aug 14, 2017
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 16
Jul 31, 2017
Stanford
H Hard · Semifinals
May 9, 2016
Rome
C Clay · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Keys | Muguruza |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 5.2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 43.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 78% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Madison Keys and Garbine Muguruza face off in the Semifinals at Rome on Clay.
Madison Keys leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Madison Keys is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jessica Pegula (Jun 19).
Garbine Muguruza is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Linda Noskova (Jan 30).
Share this match
